A pair of 18th-century highway robbers went to court over an unfair split of stolen loot and accidentally helped shape one of the most enduring principles in contract law. In this first #casefiles entry, Mide Alabi revisits Everet v. Williams (1725), the bizarre English case that established why courts refuse to enforce illegal agreements and why that principle still matters today.

Can a bank be blamed for sending your money too quickly or for refusing to send it at all? This piece explores the Quincecare duty, the legal principle requiring banks to act on suspicious transactions, and the difficult balance between protecting customers and interfering with their financial autonomy.